1964 Ford GT 40 vs. 1982 Seat 127

To start off, 1982 Seat 127 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Ford GT 40 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Ford GT 40 (350 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 303 more horse power than 1982 Seat 127. (47 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 1982 Seat 127. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Ford GT 40 weights approximately 159 kg more than 1982 Seat 127. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1964 Ford GT 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Ford GT 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Seat 127, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Ford GT 40 (85 Nm) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Seat 127. (64 Nm). This means 1964 Ford GT 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Seat 127.

Compare all specifications: