1964 Ford GT 40 vs. 1985 Jeep CJ
To start off, 1985 Jeep CJ is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Ford GT 40 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Ford GT 40 (350 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 265 more horse power than 1985 Jeep CJ. (85 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 1985 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Jeep CJ weights approximately 432 kg more than 1964 Ford GT 40.
Because 1985 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Ford GT 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Jeep CJ (150 Nm) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Ford GT 40. (85 Nm). This means 1985 Jeep CJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Ford GT 40.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Ford GT 40 | 1985 Jeep CJ | |
| Make | Ford | Jeep |
| Model | GT 40 | CJ |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1985 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 4195 cc | 1995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 85 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 85 Nm | 150 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 864 kg | 1296 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 3900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1040 mm | 1840 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2380 mm |
