1964 Ford GT 40 vs. 1989 Ford Falcon
To start off, 1989 Ford Falcon is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Ford GT 40 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Ford GT 40 (350 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 230 more horse power than 1989 Ford Falcon. (120 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 1989 Ford Falcon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Ford Falcon weights approximately 556 kg more than 1964 Ford GT 40.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Ford Falcon (236 Nm) has 151 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Ford GT 40. (85 Nm). This means 1989 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Ford GT 40.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Ford GT 40 | 1989 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | GT 40 | Falcon |
Year Released | 1964 | 1989 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 3157 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 7200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 85 Nm | 236 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 864 kg | 1420 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 4820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1040 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2800 mm |