1964 Ford GT 40 vs. 1989 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 1989 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Ford GT 40 would be higher. At 4,228 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 678 kg more than 1964 Ford GT 40.
Because 1989 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Ford GT 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1989 Jeep Wrangler has automatic transmission and 1964 Ford GT 40 has manual transmission. 1964 Ford GT 40 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1989 Jeep Wrangler will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Ford GT 40 | 1989 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | Ford | Jeep |
| Model | GT 40 | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1989 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Middle | Rear |
| Engine Size | 4195 cc | 4228 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 3 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 864 kg | 1542 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 3870 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1040 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2390 mm |
