1964 Ford GT 40 vs. 1993 Lincoln Continental
To start off, 1993 Lincoln Continental is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Ford GT 40 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1993 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 776 kg more than 1964 Ford GT 40.
Because 1964 Ford GT 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Ford GT 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Lincoln Continental, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Ford GT 40 | 1993 Lincoln Continental | |
| Make | Ford | Lincoln |
| Model | GT 40 | Continental |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1993 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 4195 cc | 3799 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 864 kg | 1640 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 5220 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1860 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2780 mm |
