1964 Ford GT 40 vs. 1995 Mitsubishi Pajero
To start off, 1995 Mitsubishi Pajero is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Ford GT 40 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Ford GT 40 weights approximately 14 kg more than 1995 Mitsubishi Pajero.
Because 1995 Mitsubishi Pajero is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Ford GT 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Mitsubishi Pajero will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Ford GT 40 | 1995 Mitsubishi Pajero | |
| Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
| Model | GT 40 | Pajero |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1995 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 4195 cc | 700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 864 kg | 850 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 3300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1400 mm |
