1964 Ford GT 40 vs. 1999 Suzuki C2
To start off, 1999 Suzuki C2 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Ford GT 40 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Ford GT 40 (350 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 1999 Suzuki C2. (251 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 1999 Suzuki C2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Ford GT 40 weights approximately 12 kg more than 1999 Suzuki C2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1999 Suzuki C2 (284 Nm) has 199 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Ford GT 40. (85 Nm). This means 1999 Suzuki C2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Ford GT 40.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Ford GT 40 | 1999 Suzuki C2 | |
| Make | Ford | Suzuki |
| Model | GT 40 | C2 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 4195 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 251 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7200 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 85 Nm | 284 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 864 kg | 852 kg |
