1964 Ford GT 40 vs. 2002 Mahindra CL
To start off, 2002 Mahindra CL is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Ford GT 40 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Ford GT 40 (350 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 288 more horse power than 2002 Mahindra CL. (62 HP @ 3200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 2002 Mahindra CL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mahindra CL weights approximately 436 kg more than 1964 Ford GT 40.
Because 2002 Mahindra CL is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Ford GT 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mahindra CL will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Mahindra CL (165 Nm) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Ford GT 40. (85 Nm). This means 2002 Mahindra CL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Ford GT 40.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Ford GT 40 | 2002 Mahindra CL | |
Make | Ford | Mahindra |
Model | GT 40 | CL |
Year Released | 1964 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 2523 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 7200 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Torque | 85 Nm | 165 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 864 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 3360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1040 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2040 mm |