1964 Ford GT 40 vs. 2008 Land Rover Defender
To start off, 2008 Land Rover Defender is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Ford GT 40 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Land Rover Defender weights approximately 1253 kg more than 1964 Ford GT 40.
Because 2008 Land Rover Defender is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Ford GT 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Land Rover Defender will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Land Rover Defender (301 Nm) has 216 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Ford GT 40. (85 Nm). This means 2008 Land Rover Defender will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Ford GT 40.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Ford GT 40 | 2008 Land Rover Defender | |
| Make | Ford | Land Rover |
| Model | GT 40 | Defender |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2008 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 4195 cc | 2495 cc |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 85 Nm | 301 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 95.6 mm | 84.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 72.9 mm | 89 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 864 kg | 2117 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 5070 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1040 mm | 2040 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 3230 mm |
