1964 Ford GT 40 vs. 2010 Nissan X-Trail

To start off, 2010 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Ford GT 40 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Ford GT 40 (350 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 181 more horse power than 2010 Nissan X-Trail. (169 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 2010 Nissan X-Trail. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 1452 kg more than 1964 Ford GT 40.

Because 2010 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Ford GT 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Nissan X-Trail (226 Nm) has 141 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Ford GT 40. (85 Nm). This means 2010 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Ford GT 40.

Compare all specifications:

1964 Ford GT 40 2010 Nissan X-Trail
Make Ford Nissan
Model GT 40 X-Trail
Year Released 1964 2010
Body Type Coupe SUV
Engine Position Middle Front
Engine Size 4195 cc 2488 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 350 HP 169 HP
Engine RPM 7200 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 85 Nm 226 Nm
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 864 kg 2316 kg
Vehicle Length 4030 mm 4640 mm
Vehicle Width 1780 mm 1790 mm
Vehicle Height 1040 mm 1780 mm
Wheelbase Size 2420 mm 2640 mm