1964 Ford GT 40 vs. 2010 Peugeot 207
To start off, 2010 Peugeot 207 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Ford GT 40 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Ford GT 40 (350 HP) has 240 more horse power than 2010 Peugeot 207. (110 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 2010 Peugeot 207.
Because 1964 Ford GT 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Ford GT 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Peugeot 207, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Ford GT 40 | 2010 Peugeot 207 | |
| Make | Ford | Peugeot |
| Model | GT 40 | 207 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 4195 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 110 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 4044 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1972 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1040 mm | 1397 mm |
