1964 Ford GT 40 vs. 2010 Renault Megane

To start off, 2010 Renault Megane is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Ford GT 40 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Ford GT 40 (350 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 129 more horse power than 2010 Renault Megane. (221 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 2010 Renault Megane.

Because 1964 Ford GT 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Ford GT 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Renault Megane (300 Nm) has 215 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Ford GT 40. (85 Nm). This means 2010 Renault Megane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Ford GT 40.

Compare all specifications:

1964 Ford GT 40 2010 Renault Megane
Make Ford Renault
Model GT 40 Megane
Year Released 1964 2010
Body Type Coupe Hatchback
Engine Position Middle Front
Engine Size 4195 cc 1997 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 350 HP 221 HP
Engine RPM 7200 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 85 Nm 300 Nm
Engine Bore Size 95.6 mm 82.7 mm
Engine Stroke Size 72.9 mm 93 mm
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Length 4030 mm 4230 mm
Vehicle Width 1780 mm 2030 mm
Vehicle Height 1040 mm 1440 mm
Wheelbase Size 2420 mm 2630 mm