1964 Ford Taunus vs. 1946 Jeep CJ2A
To start off, 1964 Ford Taunus is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Jeep CJ2A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Jeep CJ2A would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1946 Jeep CJ2A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1946 Jeep CJ2A (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1964 Ford Taunus. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1946 Jeep CJ2A should accelerate faster than 1964 Ford Taunus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1946 Jeep CJ2A weights approximately 265 kg more than 1964 Ford Taunus. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1946 Jeep CJ2A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Ford Taunus. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1946 Jeep CJ2A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Ford Taunus | 1946 Jeep CJ2A | |
| Make | Ford | Jeep |
| Model | Taunus | CJ2A |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1946 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1183 cc | 2199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 38 HP | 59 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 845 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 3130 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1460 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2040 mm |
