1964 Ford Taunus vs. 1973 Triumph 1500
To start off, 1973 Triumph 1500 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 1,492 cc (4 cylinders), 1973 Triumph 1500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Triumph 1500 (63 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1964 Ford Taunus. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1973 Triumph 1500 should accelerate faster than 1964 Ford Taunus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Triumph 1500 weights approximately 90 kg more than 1964 Ford Taunus. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Ford Taunus | 1973 Triumph 1500 | |
Make | Ford | Triumph |
Model | Taunus | 1500 |
Year Released | 1964 | 1973 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1183 cc | 1492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 63 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 73.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 58.9 mm | 87.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 845 kg | 935 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4120 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2460 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 63 L |