1964 Ford Taunus vs. 1982 Bitter SC
To start off, 1982 Bitter SC is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 2,969 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Bitter SC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Bitter SC (178 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 140 more horse power than 1964 Ford Taunus. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Bitter SC should accelerate faster than 1964 Ford Taunus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Bitter SC weights approximately 505 kg more than 1964 Ford Taunus. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Ford Taunus | 1982 Bitter SC | |
Make | Ford | Bitter |
Model | Taunus | SC |
Year Released | 1964 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1183 cc | 2969 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 178 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 9.4:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 845 kg | 1350 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2690 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 75 L |