1964 Ford Taunus vs. 1982 Renault 9
To start off, 1982 Renault 9 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Ford Taunus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Ford Taunus (85 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1982 Renault 9. (55 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Ford Taunus should accelerate faster than 1982 Renault 9. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Ford Taunus weights approximately 135 kg more than 1982 Renault 9. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Ford Taunus is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Ford Taunus. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Renault 9, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Ford Taunus (148 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Renault 9. (104 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 1964 Ford Taunus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Renault 9.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Ford Taunus | 1982 Renault 9 | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Taunus | 9 |
Year Released | 1964 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1595 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 55 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 148 Nm | 104 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 78 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 60.1 mm | 83.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 22.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 915 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 38 L |