1964 Ford Taunus vs. 1992 Toyota Camry
To start off, 1992 Toyota Camry is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Ford Taunus would be higher. Both 1964 Ford Taunus and 1992 Toyota Camry are equipped with a 1,998 cc engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Toyota Camry (106 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1964 Ford Taunus. (85 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Toyota Camry should accelerate faster than 1964 Ford Taunus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Toyota Camry weights approximately 460 kg more than 1964 Ford Taunus. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Ford Taunus is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Ford Taunus. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Toyota Camry, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Toyota Camry (285 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 137 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Ford Taunus. (148 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1992 Toyota Camry will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Ford Taunus.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Ford Taunus | 1992 Toyota Camry | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Taunus | Camry |
Year Released | 1964 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 148 Nm | 285 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 1510 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 70 L |