1964 Ford Taunus vs. 1993 Mazda 121
To start off, 1993 Mazda 121 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Ford Taunus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Ford Taunus (85 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1993 Mazda 121. (71 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Ford Taunus should accelerate faster than 1993 Mazda 121. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Ford Taunus weights approximately 230 kg more than 1993 Mazda 121. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Ford Taunus is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Ford Taunus. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Mazda 121, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Ford Taunus (148 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Mazda 121. (104 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 1964 Ford Taunus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Mazda 121.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Ford Taunus | 1993 Mazda 121 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Taunus | 121 |
Year Released | 1964 | 1993 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1324 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 71 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 148 Nm | 104 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3700 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 71 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 60.1 mm | 83.6 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 9.4:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 3820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2460 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 43 L |