1964 Ford Taunus vs. 1994 Mazda Midge
To start off, 1994 Mazda Midge is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Ford Taunus would be higher. Both 1964 Ford Taunus and 1994 Mazda Midge are equipped with a 1,998 cc engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Mazda Midge (104 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1964 Ford Taunus. (85 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Mazda Midge should accelerate faster than 1964 Ford Taunus.
Because 1964 Ford Taunus is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Ford Taunus. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Mazda Midge, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Mazda Midge (156 Nm @ 3700 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Ford Taunus. (148 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1994 Mazda Midge will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Ford Taunus.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Ford Taunus | 1994 Mazda Midge | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Taunus | Midge |
Year Released | 1964 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 148 Nm | 156 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 1050 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1400 mm |