1964 Ford Taunus vs. 2003 Acura CL
To start off, 2003 Acura CL is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 3,179 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Acura CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Acura CL (260 HP @ 6900 RPM) has 207 more horse power than 1964 Ford Taunus. (53 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Acura CL should accelerate faster than 1964 Ford Taunus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Acura CL weights approximately 620 kg more than 1964 Ford Taunus. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Ford Taunus is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Ford Taunus. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Acura CL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Acura CL (315 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 204 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Ford Taunus. (111 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2003 Acura CL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Ford Taunus.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Ford Taunus | 2003 Acura CL | |
Make | Ford | Acura |
Model | Taunus | CL |
Year Released | 1964 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 3179 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 260 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 6900 RPM |
Torque | 111 Nm | 315 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.8:1 | 9.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1580 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 65 L |