1964 Ford Taunus vs. 2006 Nissan M
To start off, 2006 Nissan M is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 4,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Nissan M is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1964 Ford Taunus is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Ford Taunus. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Nissan M, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Nissan M (462 Nm) has 351 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Ford Taunus. (111 Nm). This means 2006 Nissan M will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Ford Taunus.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Ford Taunus | 2006 Nissan M | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Taunus | M |
Year Released | 1964 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 4500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 111 Nm | 462 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1830 mm |