1964 Ford Zephyr vs. 2009 Holden Caprice
To start off, 2009 Holden Caprice is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Ford Zephyr. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Ford Zephyr would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Holden Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Caprice (344 HP) has 272 more horse power than 1964 Ford Zephyr. (72 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Caprice should accelerate faster than 1964 Ford Zephyr.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden Caprice (530 Nm) has 401 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Ford Zephyr. (129 Nm). This means 2009 Holden Caprice will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Ford Zephyr.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Ford Zephyr | 2009 Holden Caprice | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | Zephyr | Caprice |
Year Released | 1964 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1703 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 344 HP |
Torque | 129 Nm | 530 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |