1964 Ford Zodiac vs. 1965 Lincoln Continental
To start off, 1965 Lincoln Continental is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Ford Zodiac. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Ford Zodiac would be higher. At 7,048 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Lincoln Continental (284 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 176 more horse power than 1964 Ford Zodiac. (108 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Lincoln Continental should accelerate faster than 1964 Ford Zodiac. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 1136 kg more than 1964 Ford Zodiac. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Ford Zodiac | 1965 Lincoln Continental | |
Make | Ford | Lincoln |
Model | Zodiac | Continental |
Year Released | 1964 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2553 cc | 7048 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 284 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 2406 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 5500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 3210 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 90 L |