1964 Ford Zodiac vs. 1979 Triumph TR8
To start off, 1979 Triumph TR8 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Ford Zodiac. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Ford Zodiac would be higher. At 3,532 cc (8 cylinders), 1979 Triumph TR8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 Triumph TR8 (155 HP) has 47 more horse power than 1964 Ford Zodiac. (108 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1979 Triumph TR8 should accelerate faster than 1964 Ford Zodiac. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Ford Zodiac weights approximately 455 kg more than 1979 Triumph TR8.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Ford Zodiac | 1979 Triumph TR8 | |
| Make | Ford | Triumph |
| Model | Zodiac | TR8 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1979 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2553 cc | 3532 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 155 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 82.6 mm | 88.9 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 71.1 mm |
| Top Speed | 161 km/hour | 217 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 815 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 4070 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1270 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2170 mm |
