1964 Ford Zodiac vs. 1982 Lancia A 112
To start off, 1982 Lancia A 112 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Ford Zodiac. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Ford Zodiac would be higher. At 2,553 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Ford Zodiac is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Ford Zodiac weights approximately 615 kg more than 1982 Lancia A 112.
Because 1964 Ford Zodiac is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Ford Zodiac. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Lancia A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Ford Zodiac | 1982 Lancia A 112 | |
Make | Ford | Lancia |
Model | Zodiac | A 112 |
Year Released | 1964 | 1982 |
Engine Size | 2553 cc | 903 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 655 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 3230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2040 mm |