1964 Ford Zodiac vs. 1995 Seat Toledo
To start off, 1995 Seat Toledo is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Ford Zodiac. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Ford Zodiac would be higher. At 2,553 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Ford Zodiac is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Ford Zodiac weights approximately 215 kg more than 1995 Seat Toledo.
Because 1964 Ford Zodiac is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Ford Zodiac. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Seat Toledo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Seat Toledo (205 Nm) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Ford Zodiac. (191 Nm). This means 1995 Seat Toledo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Ford Zodiac.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Ford Zodiac | 1995 Seat Toledo | |
| Make | Ford | Seat |
| Model | Zodiac | Toledo |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2553 cc | 2324 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 191 Nm | 205 Nm |
| Top Speed | 161 km/hour | 215 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1055 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2480 mm |
