1964 Ford Zodiac vs. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger
To start off, 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Ford Zodiac. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Ford Zodiac would be higher. At 2,553 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Ford Zodiac is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger weights approximately 560 kg more than 1964 Ford Zodiac.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Ford Zodiac | 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Zodiac | Challenger |
Year Released | 1964 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2553 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1830 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2730 mm |