1964 Ford Zodiac vs. 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer
To start off, 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Ford Zodiac. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Ford Zodiac would be higher. At 2,553 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Ford Zodiac is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer weights approximately 635 kg more than 1964 Ford Zodiac.
Because 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Ford Zodiac. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer (382 Nm) has 191 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Ford Zodiac. (191 Nm). This means 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Ford Zodiac.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Ford Zodiac | 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer | |
| Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Zodiac | Lancer |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2553 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 191 Nm | 382 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 82.6 mm | 85.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 87.9 mm |
| Top Speed | 161 km/hour | 254 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1905 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2550 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 71 L |
