1964 Holden EH vs. 1957 Mercedes-Benz 190
To start off, 1964 Holden EH is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Mercedes-Benz 190. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Mercedes-Benz 190 would be higher. At 2,928 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Holden EH is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1957 Mercedes-Benz 190 (104 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1964 Holden EH. (100 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1957 Mercedes-Benz 190 should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EH. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1957 Mercedes-Benz 190 weights approximately 45 kg more than 1964 Holden EH. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Holden EH | 1957 Mercedes-Benz 190 | |
Make | Holden | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | EH | 190 |
Year Released | 1964 | 1957 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2928 cc | 1896 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1115 kg | 1160 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2410 mm |