1964 Holden EH vs. 1971 Monteverdi 2000
To start off, 1971 Monteverdi 2000 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EH. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EH would be higher. At 2,929 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Holden EH is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1971 Monteverdi 2000 (129 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1964 Holden EH. (100 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1971 Monteverdi 2000 should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EH. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1971 Monteverdi 2000 weights approximately 105 kg more than 1964 Holden EH. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Holden EH | 1971 Monteverdi 2000 | |
| Make | Holden | Monteverdi |
| Model | EH | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1971 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2929 cc | 1996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 129 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1185 kg | 1290 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4410 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1260 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2560 mm |
