1964 Holden EH vs. 1973 Rover P5B
To start off, 1973 Rover P5B is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EH. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EH would be higher. At 3,528 cc (8 cylinders), 1973 Rover P5B is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Rover P5B (158 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1964 Holden EH. (100 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1973 Rover P5B should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EH. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Rover P5B weights approximately 465 kg more than 1964 Holden EH. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Rover P5B (295 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Holden EH. (237 Nm @ 1600 RPM). This means 1973 Rover P5B will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Holden EH.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Holden EH | 1973 Rover P5B | |
Make | Holden | Rover |
Model | EH | P5B |
Year Released | 1964 | 1973 |
Engine Size | 2928 cc | 3528 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 237 Nm | 295 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1115 kg | 1580 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2820 mm |