1964 Holden EH vs. 1982 Mini Clubman
To start off, 1982 Mini Clubman is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EH. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EH would be higher. At 2,928 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Holden EH is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Holden EH weights approximately 465 kg more than 1982 Mini Clubman.
Because 1964 Holden EH is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Holden EH. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Mini Clubman, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Holden EH | 1982 Mini Clubman | |
Make | Holden | Mini |
Model | EH | Clubman |
Year Released | 1964 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2928 cc | 1098 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1115 kg | 650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 3410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2140 mm |