1964 Holden EH vs. 1982 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1982 Toyota Celica is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EH. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EH would be higher. At 2,928 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Holden EH is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Toyota Celica (119 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1964 Holden EH. (100 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EH. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Toyota Celica weights approximately 65 kg more than 1964 Holden EH. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1964 Holden EH (237 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Toyota Celica. (215 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1964 Holden EH will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Holden EH | 1982 Toyota Celica | |
| Make | Holden | Toyota |
| Model | EH | Celica |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2928 cc | 2563 cc |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 119 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 237 Nm | 215 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1115 kg | 1180 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1320 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2640 mm |
