1964 Holden EH vs. 1986 Jeep Cherokee
To start off, 1986 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EH. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EH would be higher. At 2,928 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Holden EH is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Holden EH (100 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1986 Jeep Cherokee. (87 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Holden EH should accelerate faster than 1986 Jeep Cherokee. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 335 kg more than 1964 Holden EH.
Because 1986 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Holden EH. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Holden EH (237 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Jeep Cherokee. (180 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 1964 Holden EH will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Jeep Cherokee.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Holden EH | 1986 Jeep Cherokee | |
Make | Holden | Jeep |
Model | EH | Cherokee |
Year Released | 1964 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2928 cc | 2068 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 87 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 237 Nm | 180 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 2250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1115 kg | 1450 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2580 mm |