1964 Holden EH vs. 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo
To start off, 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EH. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EH would be higher. At 2,928 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Holden EH is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo (183 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1964 Holden EH. (100 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EH. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Holden EH weights approximately 20 kg more than 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo (305 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Holden EH. (237 Nm @ 1600 RPM). This means 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Holden EH.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Holden EH | 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo | |
Make | Holden | Maserati |
Model | EH | Bi Turbo |
Year Released | 1964 | 1986 |
Engine Size | 2928 cc | 2491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 183 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 237 Nm | 305 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1115 kg | 1095 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2510 mm |