1964 Holden EH vs. 1987 Acura Integra
To start off, 1987 Acura Integra is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EH. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EH would be higher. At 2,928 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Holden EH is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1987 Acura Integra (125 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1964 Holden EH. (100 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1987 Acura Integra should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EH.
Because 1964 Holden EH is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Holden EH. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Acura Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Holden EH (237 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 98 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Acura Integra. (139 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 1964 Holden EH will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Acura Integra.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Holden EH | 1987 Acura Integra | |
| Make | Holden | Acura |
| Model | EH | Integra |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1987 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2928 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 125 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 237 Nm | 139 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4355 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1665 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1290 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2520 mm |
