1964 Holden EH vs. 1991 Honda CRX
To start off, 1991 Honda CRX is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EH. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EH would be higher. At 2,928 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Holden EH is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Honda CRX (150 HP @ 7600 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1964 Holden EH. (100 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1991 Honda CRX should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EH. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Holden EH weights approximately 125 kg more than 1991 Honda CRX.
Because 1964 Holden EH is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Holden EH. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Honda CRX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Holden EH (237 Nm) has 116 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Honda CRX. (121 Nm). This means 1964 Holden EH will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Honda CRX.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Holden EH | 1991 Honda CRX | |
Make | Holden | Honda |
Model | EH | CRX |
Year Released | 1964 | 1991 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2928 cc | 1492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 150 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 7600 RPM |
Torque | 237 Nm | 121 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1115 kg | 990 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2310 mm |