1964 Holden EH vs. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger
To start off, 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EH. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EH would be higher. At 2,928 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Holden EH is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger weights approximately 721 kg more than 1964 Holden EH.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Holden EH | 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger | |
Make | Holden | Mitsubishi |
Model | EH | Challenger |
Year Released | 1964 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2928 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1115 kg | 1836 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2730 mm |