1964 Holden EH vs. 2000 Isuzu VX-02
To start off, 2000 Isuzu VX-02 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EH. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EH would be higher. At 3,499 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Isuzu VX-02 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Isuzu VX-02 (215 HP) has 115 more horse power than 1964 Holden EH. (100 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Isuzu VX-02 should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EH. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Isuzu VX-02 weights approximately 679 kg more than 1964 Holden EH. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Isuzu VX-02 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Holden EH. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Isuzu VX-02 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Isuzu VX-02 (312 Nm) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Holden EH. (237 Nm). This means 2000 Isuzu VX-02 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Holden EH.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Holden EH | 2000 Isuzu VX-02 | |
Make | Holden | Isuzu |
Model | EH | VX-02 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2928 cc | 3499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 215 HP |
Torque | 237 Nm | 312 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1115 kg | 1794 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2340 mm |