1964 Holden EH vs. 2000 Lada Tarzan
To start off, 2000 Lada Tarzan is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EH. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EH would be higher. At 2,929 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Holden EH is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Holden EH (100 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 2000 Lada Tarzan. (77 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Holden EH should accelerate faster than 2000 Lada Tarzan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Holden EH weights approximately 140 kg more than 2000 Lada Tarzan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Lada Tarzan is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Holden EH. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Lada Tarzan will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Holden EH (237 Nm) has 120 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Lada Tarzan. (117 Nm). This means 1964 Holden EH will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Lada Tarzan.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Holden EH | 2000 Lada Tarzan | |
Make | Holden | Lada |
Model | EH | Tarzan |
Year Released | 1964 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2929 cc | 1499 cc |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 77 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 237 Nm | 117 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1185 kg | 1045 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2500 mm |