1964 Holden EH vs. 2000 Porsche Boxster
To start off, 2000 Porsche Boxster is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EH. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EH would be higher. At 2,928 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Holden EH is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Porsche Boxster (249 HP) has 149 more horse power than 1964 Holden EH. (100 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Porsche Boxster should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EH.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Porsche Boxster (309 Nm) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Holden EH. (237 Nm). This means 2000 Porsche Boxster will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Holden EH.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Holden EH | 2000 Porsche Boxster | |
| Make | Holden | Porsche |
| Model | EH | Boxster |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2928 cc | 2855 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 249 HP |
| Torque | 237 Nm | 309 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4350 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1300 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2420 mm |
