1964 Holden EH vs. 2000 Suzuki XL6
To start off, 2000 Suzuki XL6 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EH. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EH would be higher. At 2,929 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Holden EH is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Holden EH (100 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 2000 Suzuki XL6. (70 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Holden EH should accelerate faster than 2000 Suzuki XL6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Suzuki XL6 weights approximately 260 kg more than 1964 Holden EH.
Because 2000 Suzuki XL6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Holden EH. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Suzuki XL6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Holden EH (237 Nm) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Suzuki XL6. (218 Nm). This means 1964 Holden EH will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Suzuki XL6.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Holden EH | 2000 Suzuki XL6 | |
| Make | Holden | Suzuki |
| Model | EH | XL6 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2929 cc | 2501 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 70 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 237 Nm | 218 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1185 kg | 1445 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4190 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2490 mm |
