1964 Holden EH vs. 2001 Mercedes-Benz SLK
To start off, 2001 Mercedes-Benz SLK is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EH. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EH would be higher. At 2,928 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Holden EH is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Holden EH (100 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2001 Mercedes-Benz SLK. (95 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Holden EH should accelerate faster than 2001 Mercedes-Benz SLK. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mercedes-Benz SLK weights approximately 360 kg more than 1964 Holden EH.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Holden EH (237 Nm) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Mercedes-Benz SLK. (178 Nm). This means 1964 Holden EH will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Mercedes-Benz SLK.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Holden EH | 2001 Mercedes-Benz SLK | |
| Make | Holden | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | EH | SLK |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2928 cc | 1697 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 95 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 237 Nm | 178 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1115 kg | 1475 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2720 mm |
