1964 Holden EH vs. 2004 Kia Rio
To start off, 2004 Kia Rio is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EH. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EH would be higher. At 2,928 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Holden EH is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Kia Rio (104 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1964 Holden EH. (100 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Kia Rio should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EH. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Holden EH weights approximately 25 kg more than 2004 Kia Rio.
Because 1964 Holden EH is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Holden EH. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Kia Rio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Holden EH (237 Nm) has 96 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Kia Rio. (141 Nm). This means 1964 Holden EH will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Kia Rio.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Holden EH | 2004 Kia Rio | |
| Make | Holden | Kia |
| Model | EH | Rio |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2928 cc | 1590 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 237 Nm | 141 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1115 kg | 1090 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4250 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2390 mm |
