1964 Holden EH vs. 2005 Mazda Drifter
To start off, 2005 Mazda Drifter is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EH. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EH would be higher. At 2,928 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Holden EH is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda Drifter (124 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1964 Holden EH. (100 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda Drifter should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EH. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda Drifter weights approximately 230 kg more than 1964 Holden EH. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Holden EH (237 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mazda Drifter. (206 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1964 Holden EH will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mazda Drifter.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Holden EH | 2005 Mazda Drifter | |
Make | Holden | Mazda |
Model | EH | Drifter |
Year Released | 1964 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2928 cc | 2606 cc |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 124 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 237 Nm | 206 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1115 kg | 1345 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 3010 mm |