1964 Holden EH vs. 2005 Toyota Tazz
To start off, 2005 Toyota Tazz is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EH. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EH would be higher. At 2,928 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Holden EH is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Holden EH (100 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 2005 Toyota Tazz. (74 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Holden EH should accelerate faster than 2005 Toyota Tazz. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Holden EH weights approximately 130 kg more than 2005 Toyota Tazz. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Holden EH is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Holden EH. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Tazz, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Holden EH (237 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 133 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Toyota Tazz. (104 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 1964 Holden EH will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Toyota Tazz.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Holden EH | 2005 Toyota Tazz | |
Make | Holden | Toyota |
Model | EH | Tazz |
Year Released | 1964 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2928 cc | 1298 cc |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 237 Nm | 104 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1115 kg | 985 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2500 mm |