1964 Holden EH vs. 2006 Toyota MR2
To start off, 2006 Toyota MR2 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EH. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EH would be higher. At 2,928 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Holden EH is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Toyota MR2 (138 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1964 Holden EH. (100 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Toyota MR2 should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EH. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Holden EH weights approximately 50 kg more than 2006 Toyota MR2.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Holden EH (237 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Toyota MR2. (170 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1964 Holden EH will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Toyota MR2.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Holden EH | 2006 Toyota MR2 | |
Make | Holden | Toyota |
Model | EH | MR2 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2928 cc | 1792 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 237 Nm | 170 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1115 kg | 1065 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 3900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1250 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2460 mm |