1964 Holden EH vs. 2009 Mitsubishi Raider

To start off, 2009 Mitsubishi Raider is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EH. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EH would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mitsubishi Raider is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mitsubishi Raider (210 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 1964 Holden EH. (100 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mitsubishi Raider should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EH. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mitsubishi Raider weights approximately 425 kg more than 1964 Holden EH. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mitsubishi Raider (319 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Holden EH. (237 Nm @ 1600 RPM). This means 2009 Mitsubishi Raider will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Holden EH.

Compare all specifications:

1964 Holden EH 2009 Mitsubishi Raider
Make Holden Mitsubishi
Model EH Raider
Year Released 1964 2009
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2928 cc 3700 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 100 HP 210 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 237 Nm 319 Nm
Torque RPM 1600 RPM 3600 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Vehicle Weight 1115 kg 1540 kg
Vehicle Length 4520 mm 5560 mm
Vehicle Width 1730 mm 1830 mm
Vehicle Height 1490 mm 1750 mm
Wheelbase Size 2670 mm 3340 mm