1964 Holden EH vs. 2010 Holden Colorado
To start off, 2010 Holden Colorado is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EH. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EH would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Holden Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Colorado (210 HP) has 110 more horse power than 1964 Holden EH. (100 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Colorado should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EH.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Colorado (313 Nm) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Holden EH. (237 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Holden EH.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Holden EH | 2010 Holden Colorado | |
Make | Holden | Holden |
Model | EH | Colorado |
Year Released | 1964 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2929 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 210 HP |
Torque | 237 Nm | 313 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |