1964 Holden EH vs. 2010 Mazda BT-50

To start off, 2010 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EH. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EH would be higher. At 2,928 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Holden EH is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda BT-50 (123 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1964 Holden EH. (100 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda BT-50 should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EH. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda BT-50 weights approximately 10 kg more than 1964 Holden EH. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2010 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Holden EH. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Holden EH (237 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Mazda BT-50. (206 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1964 Holden EH will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Mazda BT-50.

Compare all specifications: